01 / 06
Is the difference between customer groups real?
The apparent 0.42-point gap fell to 0.07 once partial responses were included.
- 1,840
- 71.2%
- 2
Customer survey, Q2 · 2 files · 1,857 rows
Open case studyNo account required
Start a projectProjects where the finding was in how the data was collected: duplicate records, abandoned surveys, and one headline rate that was three events added together.
6 of 11 · Data quality
See all examples01 / 06
The apparent 0.42-point gap fell to 0.07 once partial responses were included.
Customer survey, Q2 · 2 files · 1,857 rows
Open case study02 / 06
Contractor spend rose $412,000 while headcount spend fell $448,000, leaving only a $4,000 net change.
Budget v1 vs v4 · 2 files · 441 rows
Open case study03 / 06
5,510 people were stored as 6,214 records, depressing reported retention by 10.9 points.
Donor file, FY2023 to FY2026 · 3 files · 24,680 rows
Open case study04 / 06
The 22.4% rate combined three different events; the unrecovered no-show rate was 11.4%.
Appointment book, January to June · 3 files · 26,066 rows
Open case study05 / 06
Fourteen-month-old recipe cards overstated the menu's margin by 6.1 points (64.5%, not 70.6%), and nine dishes were selling below cost.
Product mix and recipe costs, January to June · 3 files · 68,892 rows
Open case study06 / 06
Three platforms claimed 8,412 conversions but described 4,318 orders. 2,580 of the claims were the same order counted again.
Ad exports and orders, January to June · 4 files · 15,737 rows
Open case studyDrop it in and see what comes back. You only pay once you like it.